<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[TB-Tech-Tips - TechBites]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[TechBites - The Science and Technology Collaborative Community]]></description>
        <link>http://www.techbites.com/</link>
		        	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">946-457</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Do NOT Over-Engineer Things!: occupational hazard]]></title>
	            <link>/20091106946/myblog/ingenuity/z0002-do-not-over-engineer-things.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            Yes, I, too, find myself starting with a reasonable goal only to feature-increment myself to death. If I don't reign myself in, the project will not even get off the ground let alone finished.

At this point, you may want to consider the theory of Sunk Costs: should you continue to throw good money (time) after bad? Humans are notoriously bad at this.

Here's a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_costs

Good luck!	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Tech-Tips]]></category>
                <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:14:57 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">946-105</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Do NOT Over-Engineer Things!: what can I say... o yes - Told you so :-)]]></title>
	            <link>/20091106946/myblog/ingenuity/z0002-do-not-over-engineer-things.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            Max,
Well some of his college ( who shall remain anonymous) did mention the small fact of OVER ENGINEERING, however the beer managed to wash this from his memory – You still have time to walk away from the red and yellow LED’s and just buy a bunch of flowers…..	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Tech-Tips]]></category>
                <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:22:26 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">946-103</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Do NOT Over-Engineer Things!: PCB's are your friend]]></title>
	            <link>/20091106946/myblog/ingenuity/z0002-do-not-over-engineer-things.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            Max,

Perhaps having a PCB made would have saved you some time and burnt fingers.
Then again... wheres the fun in that.

I can't want to see this baby working.
	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Tech-Tips]]></category>
                <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:05:18 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">946-102</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Do NOT Over-Engineer Things!: Come on baby light my fire]]></title>
	            <link>/20091106946/myblog/ingenuity/z0002-do-not-over-engineer-things.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            So Max - You call this a "Man versus Woman Display-O-Meter". How exactly is it going to detect this and display it. There is crucial information missing - and I want to know if you intend to patent it. I could feature it in my silly patent series :)	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Tech-Tips]]></category>
                <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:14:32 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">946-96</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Do NOT Over-Engineer Things!: over kill is good]]></title>
	            <link>/20091106946/myblog/ingenuity/z0002-do-not-over-engineer-things.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            Max, 

looks like you've found a great use for those mounds of LED's. The project just wouldn't be the same with a mere 24 LED's! Can't wait for the video of the prototype in action!	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Tech-Tips]]></category>
                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:44:11 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        		    </channel>
</rss>

