<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[TB-Reviews - TechBites]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[TechBites - The Science and Technology Collaborative Community]]></description>
        <link>http://www.techbites.com/</link>
		        	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">935-100</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Silicon Blue IceMan65 Development board review: refreshing ]]></title>
	            <link>/20091106935/myblog/reviews/z0002-silicon-blue-iceman65-development-board-review.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            Nice review.  It was refreshing to something about a board not taken from a press release.	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Reviews]]></category>
                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:54:28 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">935-94</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Silicon Blue IceMan65 Development board review: Cool Board -- this might be a collector's item one day]]></title>
	            <link>/20091106935/myblog/reviews/z0002-silicon-blue-iceman65-development-board-review.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            Hi Antti -- how cool to have a board with serial number #5 -- of course it's a bit less cool to have one of the first batch of the 'B' boards when you know so many problems will have been fixed in later versions of the board.

What I would be really interested in is hearing about your experiences with the Silicon Blue FPGAs -- are they as good (low-power) as claimed? Cheers -- Max 	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Reviews]]></category>
                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:18:53 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        		    </channel>
</rss>

