<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[TB-Reviews - TechBites]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[TechBites - The Science and Technology Collaborative Community]]></description>
        <link>http://www.techbites.com/</link>
		        	        	        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">1646-428</guid>
	            <title><![CDATA[Patent Alert: ESL model creator: Claims aren't claims]]></title>
	            <link>/201001051646/myblog/reviews/z000d-patent-alert-esl-model-creator.html</link>
	            <description><![CDATA[
	            	            Actually this is a common misunderstanding when reading abstracts, descriptions and claims. The claims have to be interpreted by the lexicon of the patent application and the prosecution history. Many of these applications turn on how definitions are crafted. Keep in mind that claims may be made up until the application is issued.

So, it's pretty premature to assess what this application means. But looking at the figures and definitions briefly, claims 1 actually is claiming a very specific "computer system" that stores specific data structures. 

	            ]]></description>
                <category><![CDATA[TB-Reviews]]></category>
                <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:34:28 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
	        		    </channel>
</rss>

